[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Return to the main Scientology index   [an error occurred while processing this directive] Warning: This page contains material of a nature which may offend some readers.


This site is not affiliated with the Church of Scientology.

[Introduction to Scientology Ethics -- Chapter 1]

Scientology's Legal Victims
Between February 1995 and November 1995


From: hkhenson@shell.portal.com (H Keith Henson)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Church files suit in Holland
Date: 13 Nov 1995 08:36:01 GMT
Message-ID: <48701h$lj4@news1.shell>

Tom Klemesrud (tomklem@netcom.com) wrote:
: Andrew Milne (milne@crl.com) wrote:

: :           CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FILES SUIT TO END INTERNET ABUSE

[snip]

: So since February you've sued:

: NETCOM (largest Internet service provider in the United States)
: SUPPORT.COM
: FACTNet BBS
: Digital Gateway Systems
: DATAWEB
: XS4ALL
: CISTRON INTERNET SERVICES
: THE DIGITAL CITY
: THE WASHINGTON POST
: Dennis Erlich
: Arnaldo Lerma
: Larry Wollersheim
: Bob Penny
: Richard Leiby (Washington Post Reporter)
: Marc Fisher   (Washington Post Reporter)
: Karin Spaink  (Dutch Writer)

: Did I leave anyone out?  Or, are you just getting started?
: How much suing with the cult's $2 billion+ dollars of questionable
: origin, allow before the well runs dry?  Hitler would have admired this 
: fascist international effort!

: Ironically, the IRS considers this activity to be "exclusively religious
: and charitible ... a benefit to Society."

I think you missed one.  Didn't CoS fund the case where CAN got hit?

There is a point to ponder.  How long will the US government put up
with tax exempt status for an organization which spends fully one
third of its income suing people?  Keith Henson


[Introduction to Scientology Ethics -- Chapter 1]

This page is maintained by Jeff Lee <godfrey@shipbrook.net>
[an error occurred while processing this directive]